Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
The Journal of Literary History and Theory
Peer-reviewed Academic Journal


Shul’ts S.A.

Sergei A. Shul’ts, DSc in Philology, Independent Researcher, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. ORCID ID:–0002–3429–6714 E-mail:


For Chekhov contacts with Romanticism, including polemical ones, are significant in many respects. Chekhov’s intertextual connections with one of the late romantics, N. Hawthorne, are revealed. Hawthorne offers in his work his own version of the “transformation” of classical Romanticism, close to Sentimentalism (due to the promotion of the sensitivity of the characters). Chekhov is less connected with sentimentalism than Hawthorne, he switches his interest to the revival of the dichotomy of true and false Romanticism. Indeed, Chekhov consistently distinguishes between false romanticization (idealization, “idyllization”) and really justified, well-founded romanticization. This is close to Pushkin’s delimitation of “true Romanticism”, as well as the fundamental antinomy of “false” and “true” Romanticism proposed by G. Flaubert.


Chekhov; Hawthorne; romanticism; sentimentalism; idyll; anti-idyll.





For citation

Shul’ts, S.A. “A.P. Chekhov and N. Hawthorne (to Posing a Problem)”. Literaturovedcheskii zhurnal, no. 1(59), 2023, pp. 114–126. (In Russ.)

DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2023.59.07


1. Bakhtin, M.M. “Problema sentimentalizma” [“The Problem of Sentimentalism”]. Bakhtin, M.M. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works] [in 6(7) vols]. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 1996, vol. 5, pp. 304–305. (In Russ.)
2. Belyi, A.A. Dvoinoe bytie istinnogo romantizma [The Double Existence of True Romanticism]. St Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2016, 320 p. (In Russ.)
3. Gotorn, N. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]: in 2 vols. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1982, vol. 2, 510 p. (In Russ.)
4. Gul'chenko, V.V. “Dve figury: Lir i Firs” [“Two Figures: Lear and Firs”]. Chekhov i Shekspir [Chekhov and Shakespeare]. Moscow, GTSTM im. A.A. Bakhrushina Publ., 2016, pp. 131–144. (In Russ.)
5. Kirsanova, L. “Ekzistentsializm ‘Vishnevogo sada’” [“Existentialism of the ‘Cherry Orchard’”]. Stupeni. Filosofskii zhurnal. St Petersburg, no. 10, 1997, pp. 78–93. (In Russ.)
6. Kovalev, Yu. “Tvorchestvo N. Gotorna” [“Creativity of N. Hawthorne”]. Gotorn, N. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]: in 2 vols. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1982, vol. 1, pp. 3–38. (In Russ.)
7. Kondrat'eva, V.V., Larionova, M. Ch. Khudozhestvennoe prostranstvo v p'esakh A.P. Chekhova 1890–1900-kh gg.: mifopoeticheskie modeli. [Artistic Space in the Plays of A.P. Chekhov in the 1890–1900 s: Mythopoetic Models]. Rostov-on-Don, Foundation Publ., 2012, 207 p. (In Russ.)
8. Koshelev, V.A. “Mifologiya ‘sada’ v poslednei komedii Chekhova” [“The Mythology of the ‘Garden’ in Chekhov's Last Comedy”]. Russkaya literatura, no. 1, 2005, pp. 40–52. (In Russ.)
9. Meletinskii, Ye.M. Istoricheskaya poetika novelly [Historical Poetics of the Short Story]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, 274 p. (In Russ.)
10. Osipova, E.F. Amerikanskii roman ot Kupera do Londona. Ocherki po istorii romana SSHA XIX veka [American Novel from Cooper to London. Essays on the History of the 19 th Century USA Novel]. St Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2014, 204 p. (In Russ.)
11. Papernyi, Z.S. “Ispytanie romantizma” [“Test of Romanticism”]. Papernyi, Z.S. Strelka iskusstva: O Chekhove [Arrow of Art: About Chekhov]. Moscow, Sovremennik Publ., 1986, p. 24–56. (In Russ.)
12. Parfenov, A.I. Traditsii russkogo romantizma v proze A.P. Chekhova 1888–1903 gg. [Traditions of Russian Romanticism in the Prose of A.P. Chekhov 1888–1903]:
PhD in Philology abstr. Moscow, 2016, 23 p. (In Russ.)
13. Po, E. “Novellistika N. Gotorna” [“Short stories by N. Hawthorne”]. Estetika amerikanskogo romantizma [Aesthetics of American Romanticism]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1977, pp. 122–131. (In Russ.)
14. Polotskaya, E.A. “‘Vishnevyi sad’. Zhizn' vo vremeni” [“‘The Cherry Orchard’. Life in Time”]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2003, 381 pp. (In Russ.)
15. Reizov, B.G. Tvorchestvo Flobera. [Flaubert's Work]. Moscow, Goslitizdat Publ., 1955, 524 p. (In Russ.)
16. Turbin, V.N. “‘Ves' Chekhov – eto stilizatsiya…’: Opyt osmysleniya odnogo vyskazyvaniya M.M. Bakhtina” [“‘The Whole of Chekhov is a Stylization…’: The Experience of Comprehending One Statement by M.M. Bakhtin”]. M.M. Bakhtin i perspektivy gumanitarnykh nauk [M.M. Bakhtin and prospects for the humanities]. Vitebsk, 1993, pp. 117–118. (In Russ.)
17. Chekhov, A.P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Complete Works and Letters]: in 30 vols. Moscow, Nauka Publ., vol. 13, 1978, 524 p. (In Russ.)
18. Shul'ts, S.A. “Anna Karenina L.N. Tolstogo i Gospozha Bovari G. Flobera” [“Anna Karenina by L.N. Tolstoy and Madame Bovary by G. Flaubert”]. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka, vol. 75, no. 2, 2016, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.)

Download text