Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
LITERATUROVEDCHESKII
ZHURNAL
The Journal of Literary History and Theory
Peer-reviewed Academic Journal

GOGOL’ – SHEAKSPEARE – CERVANTES (ON “MEDIEVAL” AND “RENAISSANCE” SUB-TEXT IN “VII”)

Shul’ts S.A.

Sergei A. Shul’ts, DSc in Philology, Independent Researcher, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0002–3429–6714 E-mail: s_shulz@mail.ru

Abstract

The basis of the artistic meaning of “Vii” is a complex balancing act between “medieval” and “renaissance” overtones. From the point of view of the “Renaissance” subtext, pannochka is not a witch in the literal sense, but the plot of “Vii” is love-adventurous and love-mystical. All the fiction of “Vii” is heroic in the sense that it rises above the ordinary, but more often “heroism” is accompanied by infernal overtones, which just collides the “Renaissance” meaning of “Vii” with its “medieval” meaning, literalizing the plot of pressure on the hero of evil spirits. When Khoma takes the “witch” seriously, he is acting from a “medieval” point of view. At the same time, as a kind of parallel to his characters, Gogol’ set certain Renaissance images, dating back, among other things, to Shakespeare and Cervantes. Khoma dies not only from a too literal perception of “devilry”. Khoma is ruined by the fascination with the witch in her manifestation through “beauty”, which is unexpected for the neophyte: Khoma, under the rule of the aesthetic-artistic principle (i.e., the Renaissance context), he to some extent becomes its bearer.

Keywords

Gogol’; Shakespeare; Cervantes; Middle Ages; Renaissance; devilry; laughter.

Recieved

01.09.2022

Accepted

26.09.2022

For citation

Shul’ts, S.A. “Gogol’ – Sheakspeare – Cervantes (on “Medieval” and “Renaissance” Sub-text in “Vii”. Literaturovedcheskii zhurnal, no. 4(58), 2022, pp. 81–112.

DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.58.05

References

1. Bagno, V.E. “Gogol’ kak donkikhot khristianstva” [“Gogol as a Don Quixote of Christianity”]. Nel mondo di Gogol’. Roma, 2012, pp. 3–23. (In Russ.)
2. Bagno, V.E. “Don Kikhot” v Rossii i russkoe donkikhotstvo [“Don Quixote” in Russia and Russian Don Quixoteism]. St Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2009, 226 p. (In Russ.)
3. Batkin, L.M. Ital’yanskoe Vozrozhdenie. Problemy i lyudi [Italian Renaissance. Problems and People]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 1995, 448 p. (In Russ.)
4. Berkovskii, N.Ya. “‘Romeo i Dzhul'etta’ tragediya Shekspira” [“‘Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespeare’s Tragedy”]. Berkovskii, N.Ya. Lektsii i stat’i po zarubezhnoi literature [Lectures and Articles on Foreign Literature]. St Petersburg, Azbukaklassika Publ., 2002, pp. 317–351. (In Russ.)
5. Bulgakov, S.N. “Dve vstrechi (1898–1924): (Iz zapisnoi knizhki)” [“Two Meetings (1898–1924): (From a Notebook)”]. Bulgakov, S.N. Sochineniya [Works]: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993, pp. 627–636. (In Russ.)
6. Vinogradov, I.A. “Povest' Gogolya ‘Vii’: K istorii zamysla i ego interpretatsii” [“Gogol’s Story ‘Vii’: On the History of the Concept and its Interpretation”]. Gogoleznavchi studii = Gogolevedcheskie studii, Nezhin, issue 5, 2000, pp. 84–108. (In Russ.)
7. Gal’frid Monmutskii [Geoffrey of Monmouth]. Istoriya brittov. Zhizn’ Merlina. [History of the Britons. Merlin’s life]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, 286 p. (In Russ.)
8. Ginzburg, K. “Koldovstvo i narodnaya nabozhnost'. Zametki ob odnom inkvizitsionnom protsesse 1519 g.” [“Sorcery and Folk Piety. Notes on One Inquisitorial Process in 1519”]. Ginzburg, K. Mify – ehmblemy – primety: Morfologiya i istoriya. [Myths – Emblems – Signs: Morphology and History]. Moscow, Novoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 2004, pp. 19–50. (In Russ.)
9. Gogol’, N.V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Complete Collection of Works and Letters]: in 17 vols. Moscow; Kiev, Publishing House of the Moscow Patriarchate Publ., 2009. (In Russ.)
10. Gol’denberg, A.Kh. Arkhetipy v poehtike N.V. Gogolya [Archetypes in the Poetics of N.V. Gogol’], 2nd ed. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2012, 232 p. (In Russ.)
11. Gombrikh, Eh. Simvolicheskie obrazy. Ocherki po iskusstvu Vozrozhdeniya [Symbolic Images. Essays on the Art of the Renaissance]. St Petersburg, Aleteiya Publ., 2017, 408 p. (In Russ.)
12. Gukovskii, G.A. Pushkin i russkie romantiki [Pushkin and Russian Romantics]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 1995, 319 p. (In Russ.)
13. Gurevich, A.Ya. Problemy srednevekovoi narodnoi kul'tury [Problems of medieval folk culture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1981, 359 p. (In Russ.)
14. Gurevich, A.Ya. Srednevekovyi mir: kul’tura bezmolstvuyushchego bol’shinstva [The Medieval World: The Culture of the Silent Majority]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1990, 280 p. (In Russ.)
15. Davydova, M.Yu. “Shekspir” [“Shakespeare”]. Zapadnoevropeiskii teatr ot Vozrozhdeniya do rubezha XIX–XX vekov [Western European theater from the Renaissance to the turn of the 19–20 centuries]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2001, pp. 80–91. (In Russ.)
16. Dil’tei, V. Vozzrenie na mir i issledovanie cheloveka so vremen Vozrozhdeniya i Reformatsii [View of the World and the Study of Man since the Renaissance and the Reformation], 2nd ed. Moscow; St Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2013, 464 p. (In Russ.)
17. Evdokimov, A.A. Gogol’ i Shekspir: poehtika dramaturgii v sravnitel’nom osveshchenii [Gogol and Shakespeare: the Poetics of Dramaturgy in Comparative Light]. Dissertation abstract for a PhD in Philology. Moscow, 2011, 28 p. (In Russ.)
18. Esaulov, I.A. Spektr adekvatnosti v istolkovanii literaturnogo proizvedeniya (“Mirgorod” N.V. Gogolya) [The spectrum of adequacy in the interpretation of a literary work (“Mirgorod” by N.V. Gogol)]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 1997, 100 p. (In Russ.)
19. Zharavina, L.V. “Shekspirizm Gogolya: k postanovke problem” [“Gogol’s Shakespeareanism: to the Statement of the Problem”]. Literaturno-kriticheskie opyty i nablyudeniya: Voprosy russkogo yazyka i literatury [Literary Critical Experiments and Observations: Questions of the Russian Language and Literature]. Kishinev, Shtiintsa Publ., 1982, pp. 3–12. (In Russ.)
20. Zhirar, R. Veshchi, sokrytye ot sozdaniya mira [Things Hidden from the Creation of the World]. Moscow, BBI Publ., 2016, 518 p. (In Russ.)
21. Zhirar, R. Kozel otpushcheniya [Scapegoat]. St Petersburg, Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha Publ., 2010, 336 p. (In Russ.)
22. Ivanov, Vyach. I. “Shekspir i Servantes” [“Shakespeare and Cervantes”]. Ivanov, Vyach. I. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]: in 4 vols. Bryussel’, Foyer Oriental Chrétien, vol. 4, 1987, pp. 99–108. (In Russ.)
23. Kalmykova, E.V. “Mify o Brute i o drevneishem zaselenii Britanii v angliiskoi istoricheskoi mysli XV–XVI vv.” [“Myths about Brutus and the Ancient Settlement of Britain in English Historical Thought of the 15th–16th Centuries”]. Mif v kul’ture Vozrozhdeniya [Myth in the Culture of the Renaissance], ed. Bragina L.M., Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2003, pp. 285–293. (In Russ.)
24. Kichenko, A.S. Molodoi Gogol’: poehtika romanticheskoi prozy [Young Gogol: Poetics of Romantic Prose]. Nizhin, 2007, 224 p. (In Russ.)
25. Kravchenko, O.A. “Gogolevskii obraz Kieva” [“Gogol’s image of Kyiv”]. Tvorchestvo Gogolya v dialoge kul’tur. Chetyrnadtsatye Gogolevskie chteniya [Gogol’s work in the dialogue of cultures. Fourteenth Gogol Readings]. Moscow; Novosibirsk, 2015, pp. 117–123. (In Russ.)
26. Le Goff, Zh. “V podderzhku dolgogo srednevekov’ya” [“In Support of the Long Middle Ages]” Le Goff, Zh. Srednevekovyi mir voobrazhaemogo [The Medieval World of the Imaginary]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 2001, p. 31–38. (In Russ.)
27. Losev, A.F. Dialektika mifa. [Dialectic of Myth]. Moscow, 1930, 230 p. (In Russ.)
28. Losev, A.F. Ehstetika Vozrozhdeniya [Aesthetics of the Renaissance]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1982, 623 p. (In Russ.)
29. Mak’yavelli, N. Sochineniya istoricheskie i politicheskie. Sochineniya khudozhestvennye. Pis’ma [Works Historical and Political. Artistic Compositions. Letters]. Moscow, AST; NF Pushkinskaya biblioteka Publ., 2004, 820 p. (In Russ.)
30. Mann, Yu.V. Tvorchestvo Gogolya. Smysl i forma [Gogol’s Creativity. Meaning and Form]. St Petersburg, Izd-vo SPBGU Publ., 2007, 744 p. (In Russ.)
31. Meineke, F. Vozniknovenie istorizma [The emergence of Historicism]. Moscow, ROSSPEHN Publ., 2004, 479 p. (In Russ.)
32. Nabokov, V.V. Lektsii o “Don Kikhote” [Lectures on “Don Quixote”]. Moscow, Nezavisimaya gazeta Publ., 2002, 336 p. (In Russ.)
33. Nennii. “Istoriya brittov” [“History of the Britons”]. Gal’frid Monmutskii. Istoriya brittov. Zhizn’ Merlina. [History of the Britons. Merlin’s life]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 171–193. (In Russ.) 34. Oden, U.Kh. Lektsii o Shekspire [Lectures on Shakespeare]. Moscow, Izd-vo O. Morozovoi Publ., 2008. 575 p. (In Russ.)
35. Ortega-i-Gasset, Kh. “Razmyshleniya o ‘Don Kikhote’. Kratkii traktat o romane” [“Reflections on Don Quixote. A short treatise on the novel”]. Ortega-i-Gasset, Kh. Ehstetika. Filosofiya kul’tury [Aesthetics. Philosophy of Culture]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1991, pp. 113–150. (In Russ.)
36. Pinskii, L.E. Realizm ehpokhi Vozrozhdeniya [Renaissance Realism]. Moscow, GIKHL Publ., 1961, 368 p. (In Russ.)
37. Piskunova, S.I. Ispanskaya i portugal’skaya literatura XII–XIX vv. [Spanish and Portuguese Literature of the 12th – 19th Centuries]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 2009, 584 p. (In Russ.)
38. Piskunova, S.I. Ot Pushkina – do “Pushkinskogo Doma”. Ocherki istoricheskoi poehtiki russkogo romana [From Pushkin to “Pushkin House”. Essays on the Historical Poetics of the Russian Novel]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury Publ., 2013, pp. 57–78. (In Russ.)
39. Pumpyanskii, L.V. “Gogol” [“Gogol”]. Pumpyanskii, L.V. Klassicheskaya traditsiya. Sobranie trudov po istorii russkoi literatury [Classical Tradition. Collection of Works on the History of Russian Literature]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury Publ., 2000, pp. 257–342. (In Russ.)
40. Svetlakova, O.A. “Don Kikhot” Servantesa. Problemy poehtiki. [“Don Quixote” by Cervantes. Problems of Poetics]. St Petersburg, Izd-vo SPBGU Publ., 1996, 105 p. (In Russ.)
41. Servantes [Cervantes]. “Don Kikhot” [“Don Quixote”]. Servantes [Cervntes]. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]: in 5 vols. Moscow, Pravda Publ., vol. 2, 1961. 624 p. (In Russ.)
42. Servantes [Cervantes] “Novella o besede sobak” [“Novella about dogs talking”].
Servantes [Servanres]. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]: in 5 vols. Moscow, Pravda Publ., vol. 4, 1961, pp. 21–92. (In Russ.)
43. Strotsev, A. “Bibliya rasskazyvaet o nasilii yazykom zhertvy” [“The Bible Talks about Violence in the Language of the Victim”]. Nezavisimaya gazeta, Septemder, 7, 2016, p. 15. (In Russ.)
44. Frank-Kamenetskii, I.G. “K genezisu legendy o Romeo i Yulii”. [“To the Genesis of the Legend of Romeo and Julia”]. Russkii tekst, no. 2, 1994, p. 158–177; no. 3, 1995, p. 167–205; no. 4, 1996, p. 178–203. (In Russ.)
45. Choser, Dzh. [Chaucer J.] Kenterberiiskie rasskazy [The Canterbury Tales]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1988, 560 p. (In Russ.)
46. Shambinago, S. Trilogiya romantizma. (N.V. Gogol’) [Trilogy of Romanticism. (N.V. Gogol)]. Moscow, 1911, 163 p. (In Russ.)
47. Shvedov, Yu.F. Ehvolyutsiya shekspirovskoi tragedii [The Evolution of Shakespeare’s Tragedy]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1975, 464 p. (In Russ.)
48. Shekspir, V. [Sheakspeare W.] Polnoye sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works]: in 8 vols. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1957–1960. (In Russ.)
49. Shul’ts, S.A. “Kafka i Gogol: ‘Zamok’ i ‘Vii’” [“Kafka and Gogol: ‘Castle’ and ‘Vii’”]. Studia Rossica Gedanensia. Gdańsk, no. 5, 2018, pp. 251–278. (In Russ.)
50. Shul’ts, S.A. “Transformatsiya infernal’nogo v idillicheskom: Gogol’ – L. Tolstoi – Bunin” [“Transformation of the Infernal into the Idyllic: Gogol – L. Tolstoy – Bunin]”. Problemy istoricheskoi poehtiki, vol. 15, no. 3, 2017, pp. 127–147. Available at: http://poetica.pro/journal/content_list.php?id=74621 (date of access: 01.01.2020). (In Russ.)
51. Shul’ts, S.A. “Khoma Brut i Fransua Viion” [“Homa Brutus and Francois Villon”]. Chelovek, no. 2, 2017, pp. 144–154. (In Russ.)
52. Holl, B.T. “Gogol’s Capitan Kopeikin and Cervantes’ Captive Capitan: A Case of Metaparody”. The Russian Review, vol. 55, no. 4, 1996, pp. 681–691. (In English)

Download text