Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
LITERATUROVEDCHESKII
ZHURNAL
The Journal of Literary History and Theory
Peer-reviewed Academic Journal

DOSTOYEVSKY AND MOLIÈRE (“NOTES FROM THE UNDERGROUND” AND “DON JUAN”)

Shul’ts S.A.

Sergei A. Shul’ts, DSc in Philology, Independent Researcher (Rostov-on-Don). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3429-6714 E-mail: s_shulz@mail.ru

Abstract

The main leitmotif of Dostoevsky’s story “Notes from the Underground” is the denial of all available institutions. A stable, constantly recurring symbol of rationalism and necessity (which Dostoevsky’s hero opposes) in “Notes from the Underground” is the formula “twice two makes four”. For Molière’s Don Juan, the formula “twice two makes four” becomes his credo. Thus, what is recognized by Don Juan is denied by the underground man. At the same time, the two heroes are not only opposed, but also positively compared by Dostoevsky with each other. On the one hand, the attacks of the underground man against rationalism also imply attacks against Molière’s Don Juan, but on the other hand, the paradoxicalist turns out to be a new version and development of the libertine hero. And as is known Molière’s Don Juan is in the context of the development of libertinism. Both the underground man and Don Juan resort to sophistry.

Keywords

Dostoevsky; Molière; rationalism; necessity; polyphony; sophistry.

Recieved

25.02.2022

Accepted

10.03.2022

For citation

Shul’ts, S.A. “Dostoyevsky and Molière (‘Notes From the Underground’ and ‘Don Juan’)”. Literaturovedcheskii zhurnal, no. 2(56), 2022, pp. 39–51. DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.56.03

DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.56.03

References

1. Bagno, V.E. “Rasplata za svoevolie, ili Volya k zhizni” [“Retribution for Self-will, or the Will to Live]. Mif o Don Zhuane. [The myth of Don Juan]. St Petersburg, Corvus Publ., 2000, pp. 5-22. (In Russ.)
2. Bakhtin, M.M. Problemy poehtiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics]. Bakhtin, M.M. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]: in 7 vols. Moscow, Russkiye slovari Publ.; Yаzyki slavyanskoy kul'tury Publ., 2002, vol. 6, pp. 5-300. (In Russ.)
3. Bocharov, S.G. “Perekhod ot Gogolya k Dostoevskomu” [“Transition from Gogol to Dostoevsky”]. Bocharov, S.G. O khudozhestvennykh mirakh [About Artistic Worlds]. Moscow, SovetskayaRossiyaPubl., 1985,pp. 161-209. (InRuss.)
4. Dostoevskii, F.M. Polnoye sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works]: in 30 vols. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1973, vol. 5, 408 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kasatkina, T.A. Dostoevskii kak filosof i bogoslov: khudozhestvennyi sposob vyskazyvaniya [Dostoevsky as a Philosopher and Theologian: An Artistic Way of Saying]. Moscow, Vodolei Publ., 2019, 336 p. (In Russ.)
6. Lukov, V.A. Mol'er Zh.B. [Moliere J.B.] Available at: http://www.litdefrance.ru/199/195/ (date of access: 03.05.2018). (In Russ.)
7. Mokul'skii, S. Mol'er. Problemy tvorchestva [Moliere. Problems of Creativity]. Leningrad, GIKHL Publ., 1935, 250 p. (In Russ.)
8. Mol'er, Zh.B. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works]: in 3 vols., transl. into French by A.V. Fedorov. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1986, vol. 2, 464 p. (In Russ.)
9. Morua, A. Don Zhuan, ili Zhizn' Bairona [Don Juan, or Byron's Life], transl. into French by M. Bogoslovskaya. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1992, 413 p. (In Russ.)
10. Skaftymov, A.P. “‘Zapiski iz podpol'ya’ sredi publitsistiki Dostoevskogo” [“‘Notes from the Underground’ among Dostoevsky's journalism”]. Skaftymov, A.P. Nravstvennye iskaniya russkikh pisatelei [Moral Quests of Russian Writers]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1972, pp. 88-133. (In Russ.)
11. Tel'e, V. “Ot ‘Novykh neobychainykh istorii’ k ‘Zapiskam iz podpol'ya’: pisat' ot pervogo litsa” [“From ‘New Extraordinary Stories’ to ‘Notes from the Underground’: Writing in the First Person”]. Po, Bodler, Dostoevskii. Blesk i nishcheta natsional'nogo geniya [Poe, Baudelaire, Dostoevsky. The Brilliance and Poverty of the National Genius], transl. from French. Moscow, NLO Publ., 2017, pp. 132-146. (In Russ.)
12. Khaidegger, M. “O ‘linii’” [“On the ‘line’”]. Sud'ba nigilizma: E. Yunger. M. Khaidegger. D. Kamper. G. Figal' [The fate of nihilism: E. Junger. M. Heidegger. D. Camper. G. Figal ], transl. from German by G. Khaidarova. St Petersburg, SPbGU Publ., 2006, pp. 65-120. (In Russ.)
13. Shklovskii, V.B. Za i protiv. Zametki o Dostoevskom [Pros and cons. Notes on Dostoevsky ] Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel' Publ., 1957, 260 p. (In Russ.)
14. Shul'ts, S.A. “Dostoevskii, Apollon Grigor'ev, Bakhtin” [“Dostoevsky, Apollon Grigoriev, Bakhtin”]. Studia Slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 2020, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 193-207. DOI: 10.1556/060.2020.00009 (In Russ.)
15. Shul'ts, S.A. “Nasledie M.M. Bakhtina: kontury tselostnosti” [“The Legacy of M.M. Bakhtin: Contours of Integrity”]. Slavica Wratislaviensia, 2021, vol. 174, pp. 69-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1150.174.6 (In Russ.)

Download text