Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences
of the Russian Academy of Sciences
The Journal of Literary History and Theory
Peer-reviewed Academic Journal


Filippov Evgenii N.

Evgenii N. Filippov, magister, PhD student, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Arts, Department of Russian studies, Nám. J. Herdu 2, 91701, Trnava, Slovak Republic. ORCID ID: E-mail:


An important task for identifying the regularities of the literary process is to study the issues of continuity. L.N. Andreev implemented philosophical and aesthetic concepts in his plays, creating new forms of drama. At the same time, he relied on the experience of his predecessors. Andreev considered himself a follower of A.P. Chekhov, one of the main reformers of drama at the turn of the 19th – 20th centuries. This article is devoted to the study of the influence of A.P. Chekhov’s dramaturgy on the work of L.N. Andreev. The analysis is carried out on the material of the plays “Three Sisters” and “Tsar Hunger”. The features of dramatic action, as well as the place and role of remarks in the introduction of “external action” are considered. The study correlated the functional and semantic differences in the use of the ring composition and provides an analysis and comparison of the chronotope. The plays have similar elements of figurative structure and elements of a parody of the romantic tradition. Both texts also use a specific technique for constructing dialogues. This work allows us to trace the trends of Andreev’s reinterpretation of Chekhov’s innovations in the theater. The same techniques in the analyzed plays perform different functions and create different effects.


A.P. Chekhov; L.N. Andreev; “Three Sisters”; “Tsar Hunger”; dramaturgy.





For citation

Filippov, E.N. “Dramaturgy by A.P. Chekhov and L.N. Andreev: Issues of Continuity”. Literaturovedcheskii zhurnal, no. 3(57), 2022, pp. 71–85. DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.57.05 (In Russ.)

DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2022.57.05 (In Russ.)


1. Andreev, L.N. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]: in 6 vols. Moscow, Khudo- zhestvennaya literature Publ., 1990–1996. (In Russ.)
2. A. Tim-” (Timofeev, A.) “Pod knutom sovremennosti” [“Under the Whip of Moder- nity”]. Rul'. Moscow, 9 marta, no. 51, 1908, p. 2. (In Russ.)
3. Bakhtin, M.M. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works] [in 7 vols]. Vol. 3. Teoriya romana [Novel Theory] (1930–1961). Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur Publ., 2012, 880 p. (In Russ.)
4. “Neizdannye pis'ma Leonida Andreeva: (K tvorcheskoi istorii p'es perioda pervoi russkoi revolyutsii)” [“Unpublished Letters of Leonid Andreev: (To the Creative History of Plays from the Period of the First Russian Revolution”], preface, publ. and comm. V.I. Bezzubov. Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo univer- siteta, issue 119, 1962, pp. 378–393. (In Russ.)
5. Sukhikh, I.N. Problemy poehtiki A.P. Chekhova [Problems of A.P. Chekhov’s Poetics]. Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo universiteta Publ., 1987, 180 p. (In Russ.)
6. Talankin, V. “‘Tsar' Golod’ L. Andreeva” [“L. Andreyev’s ‘Tsar Hunger’”]. Tul'skaya molva, 22 march, no. 144, 1908, p. 2. (In Russ.)
7. Khalizev, V.E. Drama kak rod literatury [Drama as a Kind of Literature]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo MGU Publ., 1986, 260 p. (In Russ.)
8. Chekhov, A.P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Complete Works and Letters]: in 30 vols. Sochineniya [Writings]: in 18 vols. Vol. 13. Plays. 1895–1904. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978, 527 p. (In Russ.)

Download text